Speaking of the theory of randomness, a fan just interfered with the play in the Angels/White Sox game. Hate to contribute to the conspiracy theories, but in light of all the calls, is it possible that we do have a tainted series? I know, I know…as baseball fans we hate to think of it, whether we are on the winning or losing end, but the rumor mill is making us face the situation more and more. Of course, I still refuse to be an advocate of instant replay. I believe we must keep the game as faithful to its roots as possible. Let’s follow the logical path…we allow instant replay…why not allow a chip that determines a strike or ball? Eventually, why not just program players’ stats into a computer and run a season in 20 minutes? I may be old fashioned, but I don’t think we should be so eager to give up our traditions just yet.
Oddly enough, here in the eighth, although I am rooting for the Sox, I find myself hoping that the Angels put one on the board to tie it up…I just love the drama of the series! This is my General Hospital!
I agree completely with my father and co-author of SBY, this has been a very special year of baseball for me. From late Spring batting cage sessions, to summertime catch games between flipping the burgers and steaks on the bar-b. From numerous Tidewater Tides games to watching the series at the local sports pub and an entertaining, albeit ambitious, karaoke version of Johnny Cash’s Folsom Prison Blues. Looking forward to seeing the Sox and hopefully, the Astro’s in this years’ series! — cmn
As the Hot Stove season heats up, here is a thought: the Angels should acquire, by whatever hook or crook, A.J. Pierzynski of the White Sox. How many bizarre plays was Pierzynski involved in, anyway? Even if the Angels can’t get that mojo working for them, at least it wouldn’t be working against them.
On a serious note, Hail to the Sox! That weird play with Pierzynski in game two may have swung the momentum, but there is no doubt whatsoever the Pale Hose earned the pennant, and that Chicago deserves a World Series. Cheers to all in the Windy City. My son and co-author here on SBY, Chris, is a lifelong White Sox fan. When he was just a tyke he was treasuring the cards and cheering the exploits of Frank Thomas, Carlton Fisk, Harold Baines, Ron Kittle, Robin Ventura, and, yes, Ozzie Guillen. Now they finally make the Series the year he and I start blogging together about baseball. It has really been a special year of baseball for us. I’m changing the banner of the blog (for now) to the White Sox. — amn
Exciting series, but why do they play the games so late here Eastern time?! I’m forced to live on either little sleep and weekday hangovers, or first three innings, the highlight reel, and game scraps until the weekend! They just have no consideration for us folks who must go to work at 6 A.M. Oh well, I suppose I should find viable solutions like taping the game and watching the next evening. However, it’s hard to avoid inadvertently discovering the results during the course of the day. Perhaps I need to start taking a vacation every October…tell ‘em it’s a “religious retreat.” 😉
I’ll have to agree with my father and co-author here on SBY regarding the “small ball” thing. The Angels have seemed to impose this upon the series, often leaving Chicago with the “deer in the headlights” look (e.g., not tagging up on flies, making poor base running decisions, etc.) In this regard it is odd that the “little league” error was on the Angels. ****, in my short stint as a catcher in the little league I was burned by that one and learned my lesson.
Yet and still we mustn’t indulge in conspiracy theories on the part of the catcher or the Ump. Remember “Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, sometimes you get rained out"…think about that. Take care all! — cmn
I haven’t heard it mentioned yet, which makes me paranoid: Josh Paul, the Angels catcher who didn’t tag out his White Sox counterpart, broke in with the White Sox and spent four years with the club before moving over to the Angels (after a brief stint with the Cubs). You don’t suppose, I mean, its not possible is it, that he tanked the play? Hmmmm…I’m going to start circling players on my scorecard like the reporters in Eight Men Out (before the hate mail starts, I’m just joshing) – amn
The ALCS between the Angels and White Sox has turned into a small ball matchup, and I love it. Game One was decided by bunting and baserunning. Game Two? Well, Darin Erstad summed it up: "More proof that people who say they have seen it all, haven’t seen it all." Let’s be clear here: I’m partial to the Angels in this series. My son and co-author here on SBY, is a White Sox fan, hence the logo. I have nothing against the White Sox, and I wouldn’t be sad to see the south siders win the whole thing. But still, I’m partial to the Angels. Why? Because for the last several years they’ve brought small ball to the American League, and I like small ball. So it is ironic that they got beat on the smallest of small ball.
A Little League play. Anybody else think the play looked like a T ball game? Pierzynski was walking back to the dugout with his head down after striking out. You could hear all the parents screaming “Run! Run!”. And sure enough, he did. Heads up play by Pierzynski. Bad play by Paul. I was a catcher and was taught if your glove hits the ground, tag the batter or throw to first. It really doesn’t matter if the ball bounced an instant before it hit the mitt. If you think about it for a moment, there is no way the home plate umpire can see that happen—the mitt itself blocks his angle of view in those scenarios. He is calling that play on what he thinks happened. Nor is the third base umpire really the correct arbiter. Remember, he has to watch whether the batter checks his swing. It is really too much to ask for him to watch the pitch, too. That is precisely why the checked swing call is defered to the third base umpire. The particular scenario is one of those gray areas that caught up with baseball last night. I’ve always thought the dropped third strike rule was one of those anachronisms from the dead ball era at the turn of the century that should be scuttled. — amn
My son and co-author here on SBY, Chris, is fortunate: he has a team he likes and a team he despises in the ALCS. Personally I have nothing but positive vibes for both teams—actually for all four teams. It would be great to see Chicago go to the World Series. Can’t you just see those classic pinstripes and the Cardinals eternal uniforms? It would look like something out of the forties. Then again, I love the way the Angels play small ball. And as much as St. Louis deserves a trip to the Series, so does Houston. Hmmm….I have nothing to lose. Unfortunately I don’t have as much to win, either. — amn
C’mon Yanks! Who do you root for in a situation like this? I definitely don’t like the Angels, but a hunch tells me that the ChiSox will have a better chance against them than the Yanks. Would it be wrong to root for a team only in hopes that they will get beat in the next series? I suppose in a way, either team I may root for in this series will have the fate of being rooted against when they play the Sox in the next series. How about that game yesterday between the Braves and Astros? You hate to see either team go home empty handed when both fought so hard. I suppose in a way it was Houston’s turn. You hate to see the same teams get the shot every time. This game sure is getting exciting! Unfortunately, I believe I may have to go to bed and discover the results of this game tomorrow. I live for this! Garr!! — cmn